Moderators: Site Moderators , FAHC Science Team
codysluder
Posts: 1024 Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:43 pm
Post
by codysluder » Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:04 pm
Code: Select all
[05:18:17] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[05:18:17] Version 2.19 (Mar 12, 2010)
[05:18:17]
[05:18:17] Preparing to commence simulation
[05:18:17] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
[05:18:27] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[05:18:27] - Not checking prior termination.
[05:18:27] - Expanded 1763917 -> 2252021 (decompressed 127.6 percent)
[05:18:27] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=1763917 data_size=2252021, decompressed_data_size=2252021 diff=0
[05:18:27] - Digital signature verified
[05:18:27]
[05:18:27] Project: 6051 (Run 0, Clone 2, Gen 282)
[05:18:27]
[05:18:27] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[05:18:27] Entering M.D.
[05:18:33] Using Gromacs checkpoints
[05:18:33] mdrun returned 255
[05:18:33] Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=0
[05:18:33] Work fraction=0.0000 steps=0.
[05:18:37] logfile size=29674 infoLength=29674 edr=0 trr=25
[05:18:37] logfile size: 29674 info=29674 bed=0 hdr=25
[05:18:37] - Writing 30212 bytes of core data to disk...
[05:18:37] ... Done.
[05:18:38]
[05:18:38] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
[05:18:42] CoreStatus = 7A (122)
[05:18:42] Sending work to server
One immediate error and an otherwise stable machine moved on to other successful WUs.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6435 Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:
Post
by toTOW » Sun Feb 06, 2011 8:06 pm
Well ... someone else had an immediate failure, but a third person completed it ...
Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
bruce
Posts: 20824 Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.
Post
by bruce » Sun Feb 06, 2011 9:06 pm
codysluder wrote: [05:18:17] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[05:18:17] Version 2.19 (Mar 12, 2010)
There's a newer version of the core available. I'm not sure what the changes were, but if the people who are running 2.19 are getting errors and the people running 2.22 are not, it's time for the Pande Group to force an update.
Dobrodav
Posts: 1 Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:59 am
Post
by Dobrodav » Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:11 am
Running 6051 0.1.350 WU
ETA is 2 days. Is that normal ? Should i drop it or continue to run ? Estimateted score ?
Sys specs: PhenomII X4 3000ghz 6 gb ram. V7 .1.21 client-type=advanced; extra core options = -forceasm, with one additional GPU slot running (nvidia gb200)
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986 Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7 Windows 10 64-bit CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti § Retired: 2x Nvidia GTX 1070 Nvidia GTX 675M Nvidia GTX 660 Ti Nvidia GTX 650 SC Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC Nvidia 9500M GS Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB Intel Core i7-860 Intel Core i7-3840QM Intel i3-3240 Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 Intel Pentium E5500 Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Post
by PantherX » Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:12 am
Welcome to the F@H Forum Dobrodav,
If you can complete the WU before the Preferred Deadline, there isn't any issue at all as long as you have already been qualified for the bonus points. If you haven't qualified for the bonus points, you will get base points only.