Project: 6051 (Run 0, Clone 2, Gen 282)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
codysluder
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:43 pm

Project: 6051 (Run 0, Clone 2, Gen 282)

Post by codysluder »

Code: Select all

[05:18:17] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[05:18:17] Version 2.19 (Mar 12, 2010)
[05:18:17] 
[05:18:17] Preparing to commence simulation
[05:18:17] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
[05:18:27] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[05:18:27] - Not checking prior termination.
[05:18:27] - Expanded 1763917 -> 2252021 (decompressed 127.6 percent)
[05:18:27] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=1763917 data_size=2252021, decompressed_data_size=2252021 diff=0
[05:18:27] - Digital signature verified
[05:18:27] 
[05:18:27] Project: 6051 (Run 0, Clone 2, Gen 282)
[05:18:27] 
[05:18:27] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[05:18:27] Entering M.D.
[05:18:33] Using Gromacs checkpoints
[05:18:33] mdrun returned 255
[05:18:33] Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=0
[05:18:33] Work fraction=0.0000 steps=0.
[05:18:37] logfile size=29674 infoLength=29674 edr=0 trr=25
[05:18:37] logfile size: 29674 info=29674 bed=0 hdr=25
[05:18:37] - Writing 30212 bytes of core data to disk...
[05:18:37]   ... Done.
[05:18:38] 
[05:18:38] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
[05:18:42] CoreStatus = 7A (122)
[05:18:42] Sending work to server
One immediate error and an otherwise stable machine moved on to other successful WUs.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6435
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 6051 (Run 0, Clone 2, Gen 282)

Post by toTOW »

Well ... someone else had an immediate failure, but a third person completed it ...
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project: 6051 (Run 0, Clone 2, Gen 282)

Post by bruce »

codysluder wrote:[05:18:17] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[05:18:17] Version 2.19 (Mar 12, 2010)
There's a newer version of the core available. I'm not sure what the changes were, but if the people who are running 2.19 are getting errors and the people running 2.22 are not, it's time for the Pande Group to force an update.
Dobrodav
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:59 am

Re: Project: 6051 (Run 0, Clone 2, Gen 282)

Post by Dobrodav »

Running 6051 0.1.350 WU
ETA is 2 days. Is that normal ? Should i drop it or continue to run ? Estimateted score ?
Sys specs: PhenomII X4 3000ghz 6 gb ram. V7 .1.21 client-type=advanced; extra core options = -forceasm, with one additional GPU slot running (nvidia gb200)
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Project: 6051 (Run 0, Clone 2, Gen 282)

Post by PantherX »

Welcome to the F@H Forum Dobrodav,

If you can complete the WU before the Preferred Deadline, there isn't any issue at all as long as you have already been qualified for the bonus points. If you haven't qualified for the bonus points, you will get base points only.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Post Reply