Project: 2669 (Run 15, Clone 6, Gen 135) [250002 steps]

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
314159
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:46 am
Location: http://www.teammacosx.org/

Project: 2669 (Run 15, Clone 6, Gen 135) [250002 steps]

Post by 314159 »

Note 250002 steps vs. 250000.

Is this a "defective" WU?

Should I expect it to run to successful completion?


May I request a relatively quick and definitive response from someone who has accurate information please?
If defective, an acceptable remedy would be appreciated. :)

Code: Select all

[21:14:54] Project: 2669 (Run 15, Clone 6, Gen 135)
[21:14:54] 
[21:14:54] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[21:14:54] Entering M.D.
[21:15:05] Completed 0 out of 250002 steps  (0%)
[21:29:08] Completed 2501 out of 250002 steps  (1%)
Thank you, as always. :wink:
John (from the central part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, U.S.A.)

A friendly visitor to what hopefully will remain a friendly Forum.
With thanks to all of the dedicated volunteers on the staff here!!
kasson
Pande Group Member
Posts: 1459
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: Project: 2669 (Run 15, Clone 6, Gen 135) [250002 steps]

Post by kasson »

This doesn't look defective. 2669 usually have 250,000 steps. Sometimes that varies by +/- a few. Defective WU's usually have 2x, 3x, etc. the number of steps.
kiore
Posts: 925
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA

Re: Project: 2669 (Run 15, Clone 6, Gen 135) [250002 steps]

Post by kiore »

OK, I'm currently running 2669 R9 C135 G132 it also reads 250002 steps, was about to post this same question.
Is this common on 2669's ? Have only just started using the SMP client.
kiore.,
Image
i7 7800x RTX 3070 OS= win10. AMD 3700x RTX 2080ti OS= win10 .

Team page: https://www.rationalskepticism.org/viewtopic.php?t=616
314159
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:46 am
Location: http://www.teammacosx.org/

Re: Project: 2669 (Run 15, Clone 6, Gen 135) [250002 steps]

Post by 314159 »

We'll let her run (as planned anyway) and see if our friendly Guru is correct (as usual). 8-)

Thanks, Peter.
John (from the central part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, U.S.A.)

A friendly visitor to what hopefully will remain a friendly Forum.
With thanks to all of the dedicated volunteers on the staff here!!
Post Reply