Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 918, Gen 80)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
anko1
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Location: SF Peninsula

Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 918, Gen 80)

Post by anko1 »

This was an EUE, and another corestatus 7B.

Code: Select all

[05:32:04] + Closed connections
[05:32:09] 
[05:32:09] + Processing work unit
[05:32:09] Work type a1 not eligible for variable processors
[05:32:09] Core required: FahCore_a1.exe
[05:32:09] Core found.
[05:32:09] Using generic mpiexec calls
[05:32:09] Working on queue slot 03 [January 17 05:32:09 UTC]
[05:32:09] + Working ...
[05:32:09] - Calling 'mpiexec -np 4 -channel auto -host 127.0.0.1 FahCore_a1.exe -dir work/ -suffix 03 -checkpoint 15 -verbose -lifeline 3492 -version 623'

[05:32:09] 
[05:32:09] *------------------------------*
[05:32:09] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[05:32:09] Version 1.74 (March 10, 2007)
[05:32:09] 
[05:32:09] Preparing to commence simulation
[05:32:09] - Looking at optimizations...
[05:32:09] - Created dyn
[05:32:09] - Files status OK
[05:32:14] - Expanded 4800297 -> 24810145 (decompressed 516.8 percent)
[05:32:14] - Starting from initial work packet
[05:32:14] 
[05:32:14] Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 918, Gen 80)
[05:32:14] 
[05:32:15] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[05:32:15] Entering M.D.
[05:32:37] al work packet
[05:32:37] 
[05:32:37] Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 918, Gen 80)
[05:32:37] 
[05:32:37] 65 (Run 2, Clone 918, Gen 80)
[05:32:37] 
[05:32:38] Entering M.D.
[05:32:44] Rejecting checkpoint
[05:32:46] Protein: HGG with glycosylations
[05:32:46] Writing local files
[05:32:54] Extra SSE boost OK.
[05:32:55] Writing local files
[05:32:55] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps  (0 percent)
[05:39:07] - Autosending finished units... [January 17 05:39:07 UTC]
[05:39:07] Trying to send all finished work units
[05:39:07] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[05:39:07] - Autosend completed
[05:47:55] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[05:48:59] Writing local files
[05:48:59] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps  (1 percent)
[06:04:00] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[06:05:06] Writing local files
[06:05:06] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps  (2 percent)
[06:09:44] Warning:  long 1-4 interactions
[06:09:45] _UNIT_END
[06:09:45] Finalizing output
[06:09:45] her.
[06:09:45] Going to send back what have done.
[06:09:45] logfile size: 12963
[06:09:45] - Writing 13499 bytes of core data to disk...
[06:09:45]   ... Done.
[06:11:45] 
[06:11:45] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[06:11:45] 
[06:11:45] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[06:11:49] CoreStatus = 7B (123)
[06:11:49] Sending work to server
[06:11:49] Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 918, Gen 80)


[06:11:49] + Attempting to send results [January 17 06:11:49 UTC]
[06:11:49] - Reading file work/wuresults_03.dat from core
[06:11:49]   (Read 13499 bytes from disk)
[06:11:49] Connecting to http://171.64.65.64:8080/
[06:11:49] Posted data.
[06:11:49] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~14 kB/s
[06:11:50] - Averaged speed for that direction ~238 kB/s
[06:11:50] + Results successfully sent
[06:11:50] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6433
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 918, Gen 80)

Post by toTOW »

You got partial credit for it :

Hi anko1 (team 47815),
Your WU (P2665 R2 C918 G80) was added to the stats database on 2009-01-17 00:28:41 for 8.86 points of credit.

There's another report for partial credit, but someone was finally able to complete it.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 918, Gen 80)

Post by bruce »

FWIW, both partial credits seem to have come from Windows XP and the successful completion was from Linux.

This isn't something I normally check, but in those cases that I've checked before I didn't see this pattern, so I really don't want to imply that it's more than a statistical anomaly.
anko1
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Location: SF Peninsula

Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 918, Gen 80)

Post by anko1 »

bruce wrote:FWIW, both partial credits seem to have come from Windows XP and the successful completion was from Linux.

This isn't something I normally check, but in those cases that I've checked before I didn't see this pattern, so I really don't want to imply that it's more than a statistical anomaly.

That's interesting. And yes, I've got Windows XP.
Post Reply