Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540 (3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3 Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
I'm guessing that this had some sort of communications error, though it's the first one since I put in the loopback adapter (or is Corestatus 7B a different issue?). This is on Big Red.
[05:28:29] Completed 500000 out of 500000 steps (100 percent)
[05:28:29] Writing final coordinates.
[05:28:30] Past main M.D. loop
[05:28:30] Will end MPI now
[05:29:30]
[05:29:30] Finished Work Unit:
[05:29:30] - Reading up to 3725280 from "work/wudata_02.arc": Read 3725280
[05:29:30] - Reading up to 1780584 from "work/wudata_02.xtc": Read 1780584
[05:29:30] goefile size: 0
[05:29:30] logfile size: 17309
[05:29:30] Leaving Run
[05:29:32] - Writing 5527573 bytes of core data to disk...
[05:29:32] ... Done.
[05:29:32] - Failed to delete work/wudata_02.sas
[05:29:32] - Failed to delete work/wudata_02.goe
[05:29:32] Warning: check for stray files
[05:29:32] - Shutting down core
[05:31:32]
[05:31:32] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[05:31:32]
[05:31:32] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[05:31:38] CoreStatus = 7B (123)
[05:31:38] Sending work to server
[05:31:38] Project: 2653 (Run 37, Clone 17, Gen 104)
[05:31:38] + Attempting to send results [January 17 05:31:38 UTC]
[05:31:38] - Reading file work/wuresults_02.dat from core
[05:31:38] (Read 5527573 bytes from disk)
[05:31:38] Connecting to http://171.64.65.64:8080/
[05:31:50] Posted data.
[05:31:50] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~415 kB/s
[05:31:51] - Averaged speed for that direction ~294 kB/s
[05:31:51] + Results successfully sent
[05:31:51] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540 (3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3 Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Good news. I'm surprised since I didn't get the incremental increase notice and the core status wasn't 100 [which I didn't notice until I was trying to find out why I didn't get the counter message.]. Surprised, but not complaining.
anko1 wrote:Good news. I'm surprised since I didn't get the incremental increase notice and the core status wasn't 100 [which I didn't notice until I was trying to find out why I didn't get the counter message.]. Surprised, but not complaining.
Hmm, thats the exact thing I wanted to post here about, since I updated to 6.23r1 Win client, alot of my WUs end up with CoreStatus 7B (123) instead of 64 (100) after completion, and the local WU count doesnt increment upon upload, which is what it usually does when the WU EUEs. I was concerned if the work server accepts such a results or trash it as an EUEd WU.
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540 (3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3 Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
I think this is the first time I got to 100% and CoreStatus 7B since I put in the loopback adapter. I either EUE earlier or complete w/ CoreStatus 64 and get recognition for the unit.