Project: 3692 (Run 55, Clone 10, Gen 0)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
uncle fuzzy
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Michigan

Project: 3692 (Run 55, Clone 10, Gen 0)

Post by uncle fuzzy »

New core (80), 3 failures, new core, 3 failures, new core, got a new Project that's running fine with FahCore_80

Code: Select all

[12:18:57] Project: 3692 (Run 55, Clone 10, Gen 0)
[12:18:57] 
[12:18:58] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[12:18:58] Entering M.D.
[12:19:07] Protein: p3692_Seq14_Amber03_Extended
[12:19:08] 
[12:19:09] Writing local files
[12:19:56] Gromacs error.
[12:19:56] 
[12:19:56] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNKNOWN_ERROR
[12:20:00] CoreStatus = 79 (121)
[12:20:00] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0x79
[12:20:00] Deleting current work unit & continuing...
Proud to crash my machines as a Beta Tester!

Image
Ivoshiee
Site Moderator
Posts: 822
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Estonia

Re: Project: 3692 (Run 55, Clone 10, Gen 0)

Post by Ivoshiee »

uncle fuzzy wrote:New core (80), 3 failures, new core, 3 failures, new core, got a new Project that's running fine with FahCore_80

Code: Select all

[12:18:57] Project: 3692 (Run 55, Clone 10, Gen 0)
[12:18:57] 
[12:18:58] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[12:18:58] Entering M.D.
[12:19:07] Protein: p3692_Seq14_Amber03_Extended
[12:19:08] 
[12:19:09] Writing local files
[12:19:56] Gromacs error.
[12:19:56] 
[12:19:56] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNKNOWN_ERROR
[12:20:00] CoreStatus = 79 (121)
[12:20:00] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0x79
[12:20:00] Deleting current work unit & continuing...
Is this the same as http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=150?
uncle fuzzy
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Project: 3692 (Run 55, Clone 10, Gen 0)

Post by uncle fuzzy »

I did see that when I searched, but it seemed to cover more than what I was seeing. BTW, I'm running the Windows v6.0 beta console. The other post is in the v6.0 Linux section.
Last edited by uncle fuzzy on Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Proud to crash my machines as a Beta Tester!

Image
Ivoshiee
Site Moderator
Posts: 822
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Estonia

Re: Project: 3692 (Run 55, Clone 10, Gen 0)

Post by Ivoshiee »

uncle fuzzy wrote:I did see that when I searched, but it seemed to cover more than what I was seeing. BTW, I'm running the v6.0 beta console.
It does cover more "issues", but the first part is the same - 0x79 at the beginning of the WU.
Do you run Linux FAH client or is it Windows?
Do you have a copy of the WU?
uncle fuzzy
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Project: 3692 (Run 55, Clone 10, Gen 0)

Post by uncle fuzzy »

We cross posted there while I was editing. I just let the thing run through all it's troubles until it got a WU it liked and started running. What file should I look for?

edit- I don't think I have anything. I had 6 failures, and all the files in the work folder are _07.
Proud to crash my machines as a Beta Tester!

Image
Ivoshiee
Site Moderator
Posts: 822
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Estonia

Re: Project: 3692 (Run 55, Clone 10, Gen 0)

Post by Ivoshiee »

uncle fuzzy wrote:We cross posted there while I was editing. I just let the thing run through all it's troubles until it got a WU it liked and started running. What file should I look for?
If the WU is still being processed then back up the whole FAH directory. If you see that it still get assigned to the same WU then stop the FAH client just before it will 0x79 and back up the whole FAH directory. You can send it to me and I'll re-run it for verification.
uncle fuzzy
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Project: 3692 (Run 55, Clone 10, Gen 0)

Post by uncle fuzzy »

It's too late for this one (I'm now successfully running Project: 3676 (Run 21, Clone 2, Gen 15)). I'll remeber to do that in the future, if I catch it in time.
Proud to crash my machines as a Beta Tester!

Image
Post Reply