Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 264, Gen 1)
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:29 pm
- Hardware configuration: C2D E6400 2.13 GHz @ 3.2 GHz
Asus EN8800GTS 640 (G80) @ 660/792/1700 running the 6.23 w/ core11 v1.19
forceware 260.89
Asus P5N-E SLi
2GB 800MHz DDRII (2xCorsair TwinX 512MB)
WinXP 32 SP3 - Location: Prague
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 264, Gen 1)
There always were (atleast for me) 2 minutes of delay after the completed work is sent. According to your log, the client asked for new WU immediately after sending the finished one, no wonder those two servers didnt have time to sync up. The question is why didnt your client wait those 2 mins.
Last edited by ^w^ing on Tue May 27, 2008 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:40 pm
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 264, Gen 1)
As I started to respond to this, I realized what a specious post it was. I didn't write the software, I just run it. Re-read the log file.^w^ing wrote:There always was (atleast for me) 2 minutes of delay after the completed work is sent. According to your log, the client asked for new WU immediately after sending the finished one, no wonder those two servers didnt have time to sync up. The question is why didnt your client wait those 2 mins.
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:29 pm
- Hardware configuration: C2D E6400 2.13 GHz @ 3.2 GHz
Asus EN8800GTS 640 (G80) @ 660/792/1700 running the 6.23 w/ core11 v1.19
forceware 260.89
Asus P5N-E SLi
2GB 800MHz DDRII (2xCorsair TwinX 512MB)
WinXP 32 SP3 - Location: Prague
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 264, Gen 1)
Of course I know that, I dont blame you for what your client didsick willie wrote:As I started to respond to this, I realized what a specious post it was. I didn't write the software, I just run it. Re-read the log file.

Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 264, Gen 1)
You're right . . . I didn't see it.sick willie wrote:[09:53:13] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) / (171.64.65.64:8080)
[09:53:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) / (171.64.65.64:8080)
[09:53:15] Connecting to http://171.64.122.86:8080/
[09:57:46] + Results successfully sent
[09:57:46] Connecting to http://171.64.65.64:8080/
[09:58:00] - Downloaded at ~587 kB/s
Failed to connect to server .64 at 09:53:13 and again at 09:53:15 so reverted to the Collection server.
Successfully connected to server .64 at 09:58:00
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:40 pm
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 264, Gen 1)
It would've been nice to have been acknowledged with an answer. But, then, I guess the absence of an answer is an answer, in and of itself.
-
- Pande Group Member
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
- Location: Stanford
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 264, Gen 1)
We've been concentrating on making sure this doesn't happen again. We'll look into the feasibility of a manual stats recredit in this situation.
-
- Pande Group Member
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
- Location: Stanford
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 264, Gen 1)
PS We've done a manual recredit.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:40 pm
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 264, Gen 1)
Thank you. 
