To give you an idea, I have posted two entries to my blog, both of which are statistics for last week (April 29 to May 5). The
first post has all of the users separate - i.e. it is generated directly from Stanford's statistics. (Note that only active users are shown - that is why the stats are so short!

) In the
second post, I have combined the results for the three "Jamie" users into one. You will see that the total points and work units for user Jamie are higher than in the first post. Also, the team statistics show 4 members rather than 6.
Given that the statistics will never be combined by Stanford, is this an acceptable substitute? Let me know what you think.
patermann