Project: 6900 (Run 39, Clone 10, Gen 2)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Chilly2112
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:13 am

Project: 6900 (Run 39, Clone 10, Gen 2)

Post by Chilly2112 »

Same reasoning as before; I was messing around with some running processes(shutting them down) in the taskmanager before this occurred, so I do not know if this is perhaps my fault or a bad WU, This was the WU that was downloaded after Project: 2692 (Run 0, Clone 4, Gen 46) failed at 12%, I shut the client down and restarted windows at that point. everything(folding) seems to be running fine now.

Again, I do not know if this is perhaps my fault or a bad WU

Code: Select all

[05:27:06] + Attempting to get work packet
[05:27:06] Passkey found
[05:27:06] - Will indicate memory of 12279 MB
[05:27:06] - Detect CPU. Vendor: GenuineIntel, Family: 6, Model: 12, Stepping: 2
[05:27:06] - Connecting to assignment server
[05:27:06] Connecting to http://assign.stanford.edu:8080/
[05:27:07] Posted data.
[05:27:07] Initial: ED82; - Successful: assigned to (130.237.232.141).
[05:27:07] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[05:27:07] Loaded queue successfully.
[05:27:07] Sent data
[05:27:07] Connecting to http://130.237.232.141:8080/
[05:27:14] Posted data.
[05:27:14] Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 24867571)
[05:28:53] - Downloaded at ~245 kB/s
[05:28:53] - Averaged speed for that direction ~501 kB/s
[05:28:53] + Received work.
[05:28:53] + Closed connections
[05:28:58] 
[05:28:58] + Processing work unit
[05:28:58] Core required: FahCore_a3.exe
[05:28:58] Core found.
[05:28:58] Working on queue slot 06 [December 21 05:28:58 UTC]
[05:28:58] + Working ...
[05:28:58] - Calling '.\FahCore_a3.exe -dir work/ -nice 19 -suffix 06 -np 24 -priority 96 -checkpoint 15 -forceasm -verbose -lifeline 4576 -version 630'

[05:28:58] 
[05:28:58] *------------------------------*
[05:28:58] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[05:28:58] Version 2.22 (Mar 12, 2010)
[05:28:58] 
[05:28:58] Preparing to commence simulation
[05:28:58] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[05:28:58] - Not checking prior termination.
[05:29:03] - Expanded 24867059 -> 30796293 (decompressed 123.8 percent)
[05:29:03] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24867059 data_size=30796293, decompressed_data_size=30796293 diff=0
[05:29:03] - Digital signature verified
[05:29:03] 
[05:29:03] Project: 6900 (Run 39, Clone 10, Gen 2)
[05:29:03] 
[05:29:03] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[05:29:03] Entering M.D.
[05:29:12] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps  (0%)
[05:32:08] mdrun returned 255
[05:32:08] Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=250000
[05:32:08] Work fraction=0.0025 steps=250000.
[05:32:12] logfile size=0 infoLength=0 edr=0 trr=25
[05:32:12] logfile size: 0 info=0 bed=0 hdr=25
[05:32:12] - Writing 642 bytes of core data to disk...
[05:32:12]   ... Done.
[05:32:13] 
[05:32:13] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[05:32:17] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[05:32:17] Sending work to server
[05:32:17] Project: 6900 (Run 39, Clone 10, Gen 2)


[05:32:17] + Attempting to send results [December 21 05:32:17 UTC]
[05:32:17] - Reading file work/wuresults_06.dat from core
[05:32:17]   (Read 642 bytes from disk)
[05:32:17] Connecting to http://130.237.232.141:8080/
[05:32:17] Posted data.
[05:32:17] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~1 kB/s
[05:32:18] - Averaged speed for that direction ~97 kB/s
[05:32:18] + Results successfully sent
[05:32:18] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[05:32:22] Trying to send all finished work units
[05:32:22] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[05:32:22] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[05:32:22] Cleaning up work directory
User name: Chilly (Team 54196)
sortofageek
Site Admin
Posts: 3110
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Team Helix
Contact:

Re: Project: 6900 (Run 39, Clone 10, Gen 2)

Post by sortofageek »

Hi Chilly (team 54196),
Your WU (P6900 R39 C10 G2) was added to the stats database on 2010-12-20 22:05:48 for 22.31 points of credit.

Yours is the only data in the database presently. Were you then assigned a different WU?
Post Reply