Moderators: Site Moderators , FAHC Science Team
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986 Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7 Windows 10 64-bit CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti § Retired: 2x Nvidia GTX 1070 Nvidia GTX 675M Nvidia GTX 660 Ti Nvidia GTX 650 SC Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC Nvidia 9500M GS Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB Intel Core i7-860 Intel Core i7-3840QM Intel i3-3240 Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 Intel Pentium E5500 Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Post
by PantherX » Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:05 am
I was just assigned the above mentioned WU. So far, it hasn't crashed my system and the RAM Usage is 100% normal when compared to my other bigadv WUs. I am running with -smp 7 on Windows 7 64 bit with 4 GB RAM.
Memory: 954692 K
Commit Size: 1402668 K
My FAHlog:
Code: Select all
--- Opening Log file [August 12 14:44:58 UTC]
# Windows SMP Console Edition #################################################
###############################################################################
Folding@Home Client Version 6.30
http://folding.stanford.edu
###############################################################################
###############################################################################
Launch directory: D:\F@H SMP2
Executable: D:\F@H SMP2\Folding@home-Win32-x86.exe
Arguments: -smp 7 -bigadv -verbosity 9
[14:44:58] - Ask before connecting: No
[14:44:58] - User name: PantherX (Team 69411)
[14:44:58] - User ID:
[14:44:58] - Machine ID: 1
SNIP
[06:35:11] + Attempting to get work packet
[06:35:11] Passkey found
[06:35:11] - Will indicate memory of 4091 MB
[06:35:11] - Connecting to assignment server
[06:35:11] Connecting to http://assign.stanford.edu:8080/
[06:35:13] Posted data.
[06:35:13] Initial: 43AB; - Successful: assigned to (171.67.108.22).
[06:35:13] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[06:35:13] Loaded queue successfully.
[06:35:13] Sent data
[06:35:13] Connecting to http://171.67.108.22:8080/
[06:35:22] Posted data.
[06:35:22] Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 24872956)
[06:43:29] - Downloaded at ~49 kB/s
[06:43:29] - Averaged speed for that direction ~45 kB/s
[06:43:29] + Received work.
[06:43:29] Trying to send all finished work units
[06:43:29] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[06:43:29] + Closed connections
[06:43:29]
[06:43:29] + Processing work unit
[06:43:29] Core required: FahCore_a3.exe
[06:43:29] Core found.
[06:43:29] Working on queue slot 07 [August 15 06:43:29 UTC]
[06:43:29] + Working ...
[06:43:29] - Calling '.\FahCore_a3.exe -dir work/ -nice 19 -suffix 07 -np 7 -checkpoint 15 -verbose -lifeline 1904 -version 630'
[06:43:29]
[06:43:29] *------------------------------*
[06:43:29] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[06:43:29] Version 2.22 (Mar 12, 2010)
[06:43:29]
[06:43:29] Preparing to commence simulation
[06:43:29] - Looking at optimizations...
[06:43:29] - Created dyn
[06:43:29] - Files status OK
[06:43:33] - Expanded 24872444 -> 30796325 (decompressed 123.8 percent)
[06:43:33] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24872444 data_size=30796325, decompressed_data_size=30796325 diff=0
[06:43:34] - Digital signature verified
[06:43:34]
[06:43:34] Project: 2682 (Run 10, Clone 19, Gen 1)
[06:43:34]
[06:43:34] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[06:43:34] Entering M.D.
[06:43:43] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
My question is that should I dump the WU because it is already announced that P 2682 has been replaced with P 2982 or should I continue to fold?
Thanks for any official response.
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986 Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7 Windows 10 64-bit CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti § Retired: 2x Nvidia GTX 1070 Nvidia GTX 675M Nvidia GTX 660 Ti Nvidia GTX 650 SC Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC Nvidia 9500M GS Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB Intel Core i7-860 Intel Core i7-3840QM Intel i3-3240 Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 Intel Pentium E5500 Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Post
by PantherX » Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:23 pm
The WU has been running for ~6 hours and so far, there aren't any problems. RAM usage is 2.72 GB. This is what HFM.NET reports:
Project ID: 2682
Core: GRO-A3
Credit: 8955
Frames: 100
Name: SMP2
Path: D:\F@H SMP2\
Number of Frames Observed: 9
Min. Time / Frame : 00:36:32 - 27,890.29 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:36:36 - 27,814.12 PPD
Cur. Time / Frame : 00:36:37 - 27,781.18 PPD
R3F. Time / Frame : 00:36:35 - 27,806.50 PPD
All Time / Frame : 00:36:36 - 27,793.83 PPD
Eff. Time / Frame : 00:37:21 - 27,235.73 PPD
Napoleon
Posts: 887 Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked): Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads) NVidia GT430, core_15 work 2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland
Post
by Napoleon » Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:17 pm
Kasson's posts suggest that PG hasn't replaced
all 2682 WUs, at least not yet. Check
malloc error thread and the
updates thread .
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986 Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7 Windows 10 64-bit CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti § Retired: 2x Nvidia GTX 1070 Nvidia GTX 675M Nvidia GTX 660 Ti Nvidia GTX 650 SC Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC Nvidia 9500M GS Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB Intel Core i7-860 Intel Core i7-3840QM Intel i3-3240 Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 Intel Pentium E5500 Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Post
by PantherX » Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:58 pm
Well, it seems that the wordings on FAH-Addict gave an incorrect impression:
...the re-released project 2682, it has been retired ...
Source
Since the TPF of P2682 is lower than P2684, I don't mind folding it, however, I do hope that I get the credits for this one as they have fixed the Server issue.
I wonder if there could be an update on the P2692 WUs.
bruce
Posts: 20824 Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.
Post
by bruce » Sun Aug 15, 2010 6:41 pm
I can't answer your basic question, but if the project has not been disabled, we have to presume the work is still useful so if it's working on your hardware, you should complete the assignment. Dumping work should always be a last-resort.
One possibility: perhaps the server has been configured so that 2682 will only go to hardware that can handle it. If that happened, I can't think of any reason for a researcher to discontinue the project, even if there's a "smaller" project that's gathering more information about the same protein.
I'll see if I can track down a real answer.
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986 Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7 Windows 10 64-bit CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti § Retired: 2x Nvidia GTX 1070 Nvidia GTX 675M Nvidia GTX 660 Ti Nvidia GTX 650 SC Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC Nvidia 9500M GS Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB Intel Core i7-860 Intel Core i7-3840QM Intel i3-3240 Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 Intel Pentium E5500 Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Post
by PantherX » Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:11 pm
Thanks bruce, I am happy to fold this WU as its TPF is better than P2684. So far, I have finished 20% and everything is perfect. If everything goes fine, I should finish folding this WU within 2 days.
kasson
Pande Group Member
Posts: 1459 Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:37 pm
Post
by kasson » Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:32 pm
The work is definitely still useful. As we announced previously (viewtopic.php?f=55&t=15563&p=154823#p154823), we've downweighted 2682 in favor of 2692, but we still have some 2682's around. If they prove problematic enough that people would rather have no bigadv at all than 2682, then we can turn them off.
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986 Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7 Windows 10 64-bit CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti § Retired: 2x Nvidia GTX 1070 Nvidia GTX 675M Nvidia GTX 660 Ti Nvidia GTX 650 SC Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC Nvidia 9500M GS Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB Intel Core i7-860 Intel Core i7-3840QM Intel i3-3240 Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 Intel Pentium E5500 Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Post
by PantherX » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:12 am
Thanks for your prompt response Dr. Kasson. So far, I have finished 30% of the WU and haven't encountered any problems.
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986 Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7 Windows 10 64-bit CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti § Retired: 2x Nvidia GTX 1070 Nvidia GTX 675M Nvidia GTX 660 Ti Nvidia GTX 650 SC Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC Nvidia 9500M GS Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB Intel Core i7-860 Intel Core i7-3840QM Intel i3-3240 Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 Intel Pentium E5500 Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Post
by PantherX » Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:38 pm
I am happy to report that the WU completed successfully and was credited with Bonus
sortofageek
Site Admin
Posts: 3110 Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Team Helix
Contact:
Post
by sortofageek » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:06 am
Sure did.
I had made a note earlier and was just coming back in here to check again.
Project: 2682 (Run 10, Clone 19, Gen 1)
Hi PantherX (team 69411),
Your WU (P2682 R10 C19 G1) was added to the stats database on 2010-08-17 16:09:39 for 69240.1 points of credit.
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986 Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7 Windows 10 64-bit CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti § Retired: 2x Nvidia GTX 1070 Nvidia GTX 675M Nvidia GTX 660 Ti Nvidia GTX 650 SC Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC Nvidia 9500M GS Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB Intel Core i7-860 Intel Core i7-3840QM Intel i3-3240 Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 Intel Pentium E5500 Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Post
by PantherX » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:38 am
Thanks a lot for your concern sortofageek