For 2 days now ,all I've been getten on all 5 clients is the 10101 project..
Yall getten the same?
thnx
10101 on all clients all the time???
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
patonb
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:42 am
- Hardware configuration: WooHoo= SR-2 -- L5639 @ ?? -- Evga 560ti FPB -- 12Gig Corsair XMS3 -- Corsair 1050hx -- Blackhawk Ultra
Foldie = @3.2Ghz -- Noctua NH-U12 -- BFG GTX 260-216 -- 6Gig OCZ Gold -- x58a-ud3r -- 6Gig OCZ Gold -- hx520
Re: 10101 on all clients all the time???
Yes because thats the unit thats most abundant.
WooHoo = L5639 @ 3.3Ghz Evga SR-2 6x2gb Corsair XMS3 CM 212+ Corsair 1050hx Blackhawk Ultra EVGA 560ti
Foldie = i7 950@ 4.0Ghz x58a-ud3r 216-216 @ 850/2000 3x2gb OCZ Gold NH-u12 Heatsink Corsair hx520 Antec 900
Foldie = i7 950@ 4.0Ghz x58a-ud3r 216-216 @ 850/2000 3x2gb OCZ Gold NH-u12 Heatsink Corsair hx520 Antec 900
-
COOLDUDEGAMER
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:01 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding Systems -
System 1 - Intel Xeon X3360, 8 GB A-Tech DDR2 800, Intel DG33FB, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 1.5 GB, 650 Watt EVGA PSU, Western Digital 80 GB ATA hard drive - Location: Dracut, MA, USA ; Kingston, NH, USA
Re: 10101 on all clients all the time???
I was getting a bunch of them on my GeForce GTS 250 but, then I got a few 353-point WUs and am now working on an 1888-point-WU. Otherwise, the majority for the past few days have been these 10101-series WUs.
Why am I always tired?!
-
MtM
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:20 pm
- Hardware configuration: Q6600 - 8gb - p5q deluxe - gtx275 - hd4350 ( not folding ) win7 x64 - smp:4 - gpu slot
E6600 - 4gb - p5wdh deluxe - 9600gt - 9600gso - win7 x64 - smp:2 - 2 gpu slots
E2160 - 2gb - ?? - onboard gpu - win7 x32 - 2 uniprocessor slots
T5450 - 4gb - ?? - 8600M GT 512 ( DDR2 ) - win7 x64 - smp:2 - gpu slot - Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: 10101 on all clients all the time???
The assignment servers use a weighting method, if the project owner has set it's value higher then other projects, this is what we'll get. Nothing bad about that imo, as I think science is best served when letting the scientists decide which wu is more important at any time. If you're having issues with a particular core/projects, well that's something I think they need to work on. Would be nice to block certain projects, BUT I don't want people to be able to cherry pick wu's in any sense. So two totally opposite views on the same issue 