Page 1 of 1

Suggestion for section "issue with specific WU"

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:23 pm
by toTOW
Regarding this section : http://foldingforum.org/viewforum.php?f=19

I think it could be better to have one topic per project instead of one topic per WU ... it would be easier for people to find what have already happened in a project before posting thier own WU.

For example, topic could be "pXXXX", instead of "pXXXX (run X / gen X / clone X)"

What do you think about this idea :?:

We could also split topics into differents issues : "pXXXX : Early Unit End", "pXXXX : Unknown Error" ... It would be easier to isolate differents issues ;)

Re: Suggestion for section "issue with specific WU"

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:38 pm
by gwildperson
I happen to agree with you, but I'm not sure what can be done about it. Certainly if the Moderators find a topic called. "pXXXX (run X / gen X / clone X)" they can edit the title to be "pXXXX" and if necessary, put (run X / gen X / clone X) into the text of the first post. If there's already a pXXXX topic they'd have to lock one and point to the other one since I heard that they don't have a merge function.

... or maybe you're just asking the Moderators to post a rule about topic titles and hope that everyone reads it.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:30 pm
by toTOW
I think moderators :

a) didn't see this topic
b) don't care

Choose the correct answer ;)

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:34 pm
by 7im
None of the above!

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:16 pm
by toTOW
So can we have your opinion :?:

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:19 pm
by gwildperson
toTOW wrote:So can we have your opinion :?:
What's the connection between "having your opinion" and saying that the moderators don't pay attention / don't care?

Choose the correct answer ;)
A) none
B) none

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:51 pm
by 7im
toTOW wrote:So can we have your opinion :?:
No. I'll express my opinion to the forum administration, and they can make a change if so needed.

Please consider the possible consequences of bashing the forum administration by saying they don't care, etc. And don't assume that just because nothing has been done yet, or that no one has commented yet, that someone hasn't already seen this thread, and started discussing it with the Admins.



I would like to get feedback from more forum users on this suggestion. Please comment if you wish.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:15 pm
by MoneyGuyBK
I would like to get feedback from more forum users on this suggestion. Please comment if you wish.
Just my .02/.03
I am always for streamlining and more organized threads.

We'll let the powers to be make the decision.

Peace

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:46 pm
by sortofageek
toTOW wrote:I think moderators :

a) didn't see this topic
b) don't care

Choose the correct answer ;)
Just a gentle suggestion ... if you feel a post isn't getting attention from mods/admins quickly enough and that it is urgent, try sending a private message with a link and the reason why you feel it is that time sensitive. We mostly try to help where we can, while dealing with real life like everyone else. :)

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:06 pm
by codysluder
sortofageek wrote:... and the reason why you feel it is that time sensitive.
Seeing as how he called the Mods insensitive just over 24 hours after the original post, he must think it's really, really important. IMHO, it won't really matter if it takes the Mods a month to respond.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:46 pm
by 7im
The v3 forum software upgrade comes first. We'll deal with less urgent issues after.

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:19 am
by Flathead74
I like being able to search, and find, using the full, P: xxxx (Rxx, Cxx, Gxx),
as in a simple copy and paste from the Fahlog.txt.

So, I guess that I disagree with the OP.

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:24 am
by brityank
7im wrote:
toTOW wrote:So can we have your opinion :?:
I would like to get feedback from more forum users on this suggestion. Please comment if you wish.
Aw Geez !! Not again :!:

Hey -- be grateful this isn't like a typical Government Bureaucracy, or you'd be waiting 'till next week :!: :!: :roll:

Looks as if toTOW just cleared out all his Atta Boy's for the year. :lol:

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:01 am
by Xilikon
IMHO, I prefer the current way by WU since it's easier to spot the troublesome workunit in the forum listing than dig thru a project thread for the specific WU.

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:27 am
by bruce
Xilikon wrote:IMHO, I prefer the current way by WU since it's easier to spot the troublesome workunit in the forum listing than dig thru a project thread for the specific WU.
It's also easier to spot some other things if all the WUs from a single project are in the same thread. Both methods have some advantages over the other.

Lack of a response from a Mod does not mean that they didn't read the post. The idea was clearly stated so I didn't need to ask you for more information. I believe that no response is required until we either do what you suggested or decide NOT to do it. Personally, I've been rather busy with RL and I don't always reply when I don't need to.