Page 1 of 1
Project: 10101 (Run 24, Clone 9, Gen 0)
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:26 am
by DrSpalding
Hi,
I just received this new project for my nvidia gpu folder. It is using core 11 and it is not listed in the summary page. It appears that it will probably be worth 500-700 points based on the 2 minute frame time on a 9800 GT.
Any ideas on how many points it is ane when it will show up in the summary page so FAHMon can find it?
Thanks
Re: Project: 10101 (Run 24, Clone 9, Gen 0)
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:36 am
by Tobit
Can you post some of your log file showing this WU. I doubt it's actually a P10101 as another log file I looked at for this showed it actually to be crunching a p4744_lam5w_300K - it's likely a bad WU but may actually crunch properly If it does, it's worth 548 points.
Re: Project: 10101 (Run 24, Clone 9, Gen 0)
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:44 am
by DrSpalding
No, it's definitely thinking it's 10101 and it is listed in the description page here:
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/fahproject?p=10101
No points are listed anywhere I can find however. I see your point about it being labeled as a p4744_lam5w_300K though:
Code: Select all
[03:56:35] + Number of Units Completed: 1747
[03:56:39] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[03:56:39] + Attempting to get work packet
[03:56:39] - Connecting to assignment server
[03:56:39] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.71).
[03:56:39] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[03:56:39] Loaded queue successfully.
[03:56:40] + Closed connections
[03:56:40]
[03:56:40] + Processing work unit
[03:56:40] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[03:56:40] Core found.
[03:56:40] Working on queue slot 07 [December 28 03:56:40 UTC]
[03:56:40] + Working ...
[03:56:40]
[03:56:40] *------------------------------*
[03:56:40] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[03:56:40] Version 1.19 (Mon Nov 3 09:34:13 PST 2008)
[03:56:40]
[03:56:40] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[03:56:40] Build host: amoeba
[03:56:40] Board Type: Nvidia
[03:56:40] Core :
[03:56:40] Preparing to commence simulation
[03:56:40] - Looking at optimizations...
[03:56:40] - Created dyn
[03:56:40] - Files status OK
[03:56:40] - Expanded 84652 -> 447303 (decompressed 528.4 percent)
[03:56:40] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=84652 data_size=447303, decompressed_data_size=447303 diff=0
[03:56:40] - Digital signature verified
[03:56:40]
[03:56:40] Project: 10101 (Run 24, Clone 9, Gen 0)
[03:56:40]
[03:56:40] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[03:56:40] Entering M.D.
[03:56:47] Working on p4744_lam5w_300K
[03:56:54] Client config found, loading data.
[03:56:54] Starting GUI Server
[03:58:58] Completed 1%
[04:01:00] Completed 2%
[04:03:03] Completed 3%
[04:05:06] Completed 4%
[04:07:09] Completed 5%
My unitinfo.txt file:
Code: Select all
Current Work Unit
-----------------
Name: p4744_lam5w_300K
Tag: -
Download time: December 28 03:56:40
Due time: December 31 03:56:40
Progress: 20% [||________]
Which confirms what you said. Something told it 10101 though...
Re: Project: 10101 (Run 24, Clone 9, Gen 0)
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:08 am
by Tobit
I'm beginning to think that some private betas might have slipped out and/or the work unit name is wrong. Something is definitely wacky but these appear to be crunching properly. Hopefully bruce, a beta tester, or a developer can respond soon and enlighten us and end the speculation.
Re: Project: 10101 (Run 24, Clone 9, Gen 0)
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:39 am
by Tobit
gbowman, a developer, has answered this here: viewtopic.php?f=52&t=12630#p123743