Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 94, Gen 90)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Zagen30
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:45 am
Hardware configuration: Core i7 3770K @3.5 GHz (not folding), 8 GB DDR3 @2133 MHz, 2xGTX 780 @1215 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit running 7.3.6 w/ 1xSMP, 2xGPU

4P E5-4650 @3.1 GHz, 64 GB DDR3 @1333MHz, Ubuntu Desktop 13.10 64-bit

Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 94, Gen 90)

Post by Zagen30 »

EUE'd on me, which is an extreme rarity nowadays what with 6.23 being pretty stable:

Code: Select all

[07:14:04] Completed 210000 out of 250000 steps  (84 percent)
[07:44:51] Writing local files
[07:44:52] Completed 212500 out of 250000 steps  (85 percent)
[08:08:10] Warning:  long 1-4 interactions
[08:08:12] Gromacs cannot continue further.
[08:08:12] Going to send back what have done.
[08:08:12] logfile size: 172796
[08:08:12] - Writing 173332 bytes of core data to disk...
[08:08:12]   ... Done.
[08:08:12] - Failed to delete work/wudata_05.arc
[08:08:12] No C.P. to delete.
[08:08:12] Warning:  check for stray files
[08:10:13] 
[08:10:13] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[08:10:13] 
[08:10:13] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[08:10:19] CoreStatus = 7B (123)
[08:10:19] Sending work to server
[08:10:19] Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 94, Gen 90)
It doesn't look like I was credited based on the update amounts shown on EOC stats (85% of 1920 should be around 1600 points, and I didn't get that or more any time around the failure). And the log says it did return the partially completed WU successfully.
Image
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6433
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 94, Gen 90)

Post by toTOW »

Hi Zagen30 (team 0),
Your WU (P2665 R3 C94 G90) was added to the stats database on 2009-02-11 00:27:53 for 620.86 points of credit.

There are two other reports of EUE for this WU in the DB.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Zagen30
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:45 am
Hardware configuration: Core i7 3770K @3.5 GHz (not folding), 8 GB DDR3 @2133 MHz, 2xGTX 780 @1215 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit running 7.3.6 w/ 1xSMP, 2xGPU

4P E5-4650 @3.1 GHz, 64 GB DDR3 @1333MHz, Ubuntu Desktop 13.10 64-bit

Re: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 94, Gen 90)

Post by Zagen30 »

I guess that would explain the weird # of points I got in the 6 am update. At this point I have 6 clients running, so trying to figure what turned in when can sometimes be confusing.

Is partial credit supposed to be exactly proportional to the percentage done? I seem to recall on other EUEs getting x*y credit where x was the percentage complete and y was the full credit for that WU (i.e. where this would have gotten me 85% of 1920 points = 1634).
Image
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6433
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 94, Gen 90)

Post by toTOW »

Zagen30 wrote:Is partial credit supposed to be exactly proportional to the percentage done?
I don't think so. It's proportional to science value (or to the part which can be useful). I've already seen some EUE at 90+% giving only a couple of points for credit :(
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Zagen30
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:45 am
Hardware configuration: Core i7 3770K @3.5 GHz (not folding), 8 GB DDR3 @2133 MHz, 2xGTX 780 @1215 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit running 7.3.6 w/ 1xSMP, 2xGPU

4P E5-4650 @3.1 GHz, 64 GB DDR3 @1333MHz, Ubuntu Desktop 13.10 64-bit

Re: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 94, Gen 90)

Post by Zagen30 »

Bummer. Oh well.
Image
Post Reply