Project: 5506 (Run 0, Clone 169, Gen 310)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
MtM
Posts: 1579
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:20 pm
Hardware configuration: Q6600 - 8gb - p5q deluxe - gtx275 - hd4350 ( not folding ) win7 x64 - smp:4 - gpu slot
E6600 - 4gb - p5wdh deluxe - 9600gt - 9600gso - win7 x64 - smp:2 - 2 gpu slots
E2160 - 2gb - ?? - onboard gpu - win7 x32 - 2 uniprocessor slots
T5450 - 4gb - ?? - 8600M GT 512 ( DDR2 ) - win7 x64 - smp:2 - gpu slot
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Project: 5506 (Run 0, Clone 169, Gen 310)

Post by MtM »

Code: Select all

-FAHMON NAME:	9600GT
INDEX:		3
LOCATION:	C:\Program Files (x86)\Electronic Arts\
LOCAL CLIENT:	True
CLIENT:		Windows GPU Console Edition - Folding@Home Client Version 6.20r1
FLAGS:		-forceasm -verbosity 9 
CORE:		Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta - Version 1.19 (Mon Nov 3 09:34:13 PST 2008)
StartTime:		21:09:30
StartPercentage:		0
EndTime:			21:09:31
EndPercentage:		0
-VIDEO CARD
Caption		NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Description	NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
AdapterRam	512MB
DriverVersion	7.15.11.7784
DriverDate	20080806232600.000000-000
Index		0
InfSection	nv_G9x_HD
COMPILER:	Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
BUILDHOST:	amoeba
BOARD:		Nvidia
PROJECT:	Project: 5506 (Run 0, Clone 169, Gen 310)
CORESTATUS:	CoreStatus = 7A (122)
TIMESTAMP:	[21:09:34] 
[21:09:18] Version 1.19 (Mon Nov 3 09:34:13 PST 2008)
[21:09:18] 
[21:09:18] Compiler  : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86 
[21:09:18] Build host: amoeba
[21:09:18] Board Type: Nvidia
[21:09:18] Core      : 
[21:09:18] Preparing to commence simulation
[21:09:18] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[21:09:18] - Not checking prior termination.
[21:09:19] - Expanded 45485 -> 246249 (decompressed 541.3 percent)
[21:09:19] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=45485 data_size=246249, decompressed_data_size=246249 diff=0
[21:09:19] - Digital signature verified
[21:09:19] 
[21:09:19] Project: 5506 (Run 0, Clone 169, Gen 310)
[21:09:19] 
[21:09:19] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[21:09:19] Entering M.D.
[21:09:24] Will resume from checkpoint file
[21:09:27] Working on p5506_supervillin_e1
[21:09:30] Client config found, loading data.
[21:09:30] Resuming from checkpoint
[21:09:30] Starting GUI Server
[21:09:31] Verified work/wudata_08.log
[21:09:31] Verified work/wudata_08.edr
[21:09:31] Verified work/wudata_08.xtc
[21:09:31] Completed 35%
[21:09:31] mdrun_gpu returned 
[21:09:31] Calculated & specified T inconsisitent
[21:09:31] 
[21:09:31] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
[21:09:34] CoreStatus = 7A (122)
[21:09:34] Sending work to server
[21:09:34] Project: 5506 (Run 0, Clone 169, Gen 310)
[21:09:34] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_08.dat
[21:09:34] - Error: Could not read unit 08 file. Removing from queue.
[21:09:34] Trying to send all finished work units
[21:09:34] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[21:09:34] - Preparing to get new work unit...
btw the 'resume from checkpoint' is wrong ( again ) as it was a freshly downloaded wu. Just completed a 5506 before this started I watched it happen. It's running the same prcg again now and it started normally.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6432
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 5506 (Run 0, Clone 169, Gen 310)

Post by toTOW »

There's no data for this WU in the DB yet :(

That's another occurrence of the unreadable result file issue after an UM/EUE ... :?
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
MtM
Posts: 1579
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:20 pm
Hardware configuration: Q6600 - 8gb - p5q deluxe - gtx275 - hd4350 ( not folding ) win7 x64 - smp:4 - gpu slot
E6600 - 4gb - p5wdh deluxe - 9600gt - 9600gso - win7 x64 - smp:2 - 2 gpu slots
E2160 - 2gb - ?? - onboard gpu - win7 x32 - 2 uniprocessor slots
T5450 - 4gb - ?? - 8600M GT 512 ( DDR2 ) - win7 x64 - smp:2 - gpu slot
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Project: 5506 (Run 0, Clone 169, Gen 310)

Post by MtM »

toTOW wrote:There's no data for this WU in the DB yet :(

That's another occurrence of the unreadable result file issue after an UM/EUE ... :?
I reported some of these before, also pointed to the fact that it couldn't read the results file and complained about the queue being corrupted. Which after checking with -queueinfo didn't seem to be true. Idk?
Post Reply