11747 (0, 64, 22) dumped

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
iceman1992
Posts: 527
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:16 pm

11747 (0, 64, 22) dumped

Post by iceman1992 »

Code: Select all

14:51:14:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1000000 out of 1000000 steps (100%)
14:51:19:WU01:FS01:0x22:Saving result file ..\logfile_01.txt
14:51:19:WU01:FS01:0x22:Saving result file checkpointState.xml
14:51:23:WU01:FS01:0x22:Saving result file checkpt.crc
14:51:23:WU01:FS01:0x22:Saving result file positions.xtc
14:51:24:WU01:FS01:0x22:Saving result file science.log
14:51:24:WU01:FS01:0x22:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
14:51:25:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
14:51:25:WU01:FS01:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:11747 run:0 clone:64 gen:22 core:0x22 unit:0x000000348ca304e75e6a7fc5c9df5e6c
14:51:25:WU01:FS01:Uploading 21.92MiB to 140.163.4.231
14:51:25:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 140.163.4.231:8080
14:52:48:WU01:FS01:Upload 0.57%
14:52:54:WU01:FS01:Upload 6.27%
14:53:00:WU01:FS01:Upload 12.83%
14:53:06:WU01:FS01:Upload 15.39%
14:53:12:WU01:FS01:Upload 21.95%
14:53:18:WU01:FS01:Upload 28.51%
14:53:24:WU01:FS01:Upload 35.07%
14:53:30:WU01:FS01:Upload 40.77%
14:53:36:WU01:FS01:Upload 47.32%
14:53:42:WU01:FS01:Upload 52.74%
14:53:52:WU01:FS01:Upload 58.16%
14:53:58:WU01:FS01:Upload 62.43%
14:54:04:WU01:FS01:Upload 67.85%
14:54:10:WU01:FS01:Upload 68.71%
14:54:17:WU01:FS01:Upload 70.70%
14:54:23:WU01:FS01:Upload 77.26%
14:54:29:WU01:FS01:Upload 83.82%
14:54:35:WU01:FS01:Upload 90.37%
14:54:41:WU01:FS01:Upload 96.93%
14:54:44:WU01:FS01:Upload complete
14:54:44:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_QUIT (404)
14:54:44:WARNING:WU01:FS01:Server did not like results, dumping
14:54:44:WU01:FS01:Cleaning up
muziqaz
Posts: 901
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
Hardware configuration: 7950x3D, 5950x, 5800x3D, 3900x
7900xtx, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX 550 640SP
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 11747 (0, 64, 22) dumped

Post by muziqaz »

This particular work unit has been returned by other person 2 days ago. And for some reason server managed to sent it out to you. And since server already had results of this unit from before, it dumped yours.

Another, more likely situation is, that you received this WU before that other person received it, but since you did not fold it continually you did not finish it by the set deadline, at that point WU was re issued. You were still folding and finished after the re-issued WU was returned by someone with faster hardware.
FAH Beta tester
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 7020
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: 11747 (0, 64, 22) dumped

Post by PantherX »

muziqaz wrote:...And since server already had results of this unit from before, it dumped yours...
AFAIK, a Server will not dump a WU that it legitimately assigned even if it received the original WU. It was dumped because it either failed the validation check or (and this few weeks ago) a Server configuration was being investigated to see if that could be causing the issue.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
iceman1992
Posts: 527
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:16 pm

Re: 11747 (0, 64, 22) dumped

Post by iceman1992 »

muziqaz wrote:but since you did not fold it continually you did not finish it by the set deadline, at that point WU was re issued. You were still folding and finished after the re-issued WU was returned by someone with faster hardware.
No, I was folding it continually, and with decent hardware too, never paused it and it was definitely way before the timeout.
anandhanju
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: 11747 (0, 64, 22) dumped

Post by anandhanju »

Can you post the section from the log when it was assigned to you? And also, considering the log does not have the date, maybe indicate the day when you received it?
Post Reply