Project: 6524 (Run 10, Clone 48, Gen 65) - isn't bad

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Napoleon
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland

Project: 6524 (Run 10, Clone 48, Gen 65) - isn't bad

Post by Napoleon »

Had an accident with this one, I managed to corrupt the work folder myself. I interrupted the client and blundered a minor modification to my client startup script. I got the very same WU back once I deleted the work folder and queue.dat, now crunching it again from scratch. Most likely the WU is just fine, but I'll monitor this one closely anyway. Just thought to mention that if there should be any problems with this WU, the following partial return shouldn't be counted.

Code: Select all

[22:57:47] Project: 6524 (Run 10, Clone 48, Gen 65)
[22:57:47] 
[22:57:47] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[22:57:47] Entering M.D.
[22:57:54] Protein: 1CFC_A_11 in water
[22:57:54] 
[22:57:54] Writing local files
[22:57:54] Extra SSE boost OK.
[22:57:55] Writing local files
[22:57:55] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps  (0%)
[22:58:11] CoreStatus = 1 (1)
[22:58:11] Sending work to server
[22:58:11] Project: 6524 (Run 10, Clone 48, Gen 65)
[22:58:11] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[22:58:11] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_03.dat
[22:58:11] - Error: Could not read unit 03 file. Removing from queue.
[22:58:11] Trying to send all finished work units
[22:58:11] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[22:58:11] + -oneunit flag given and have now finished a unit. Exiting.***** Got a SIGTERM signal (2)
[22:58:11] Killing all core threads

Folding@Home Client Shutdown.
Could someone check if I've made any other classic WU "bad returns" after this successful one:

Code: Select all

[06:52:23] Completed 250000 out of 250000 steps  (100%)
[06:52:23] Writing final coordinates.
[06:52:24] Past main M.D. loop
[06:53:24] 
[06:53:24] Finished Work Unit:
[06:53:24] - Reading up to 384840 from "work/wudata_01.arc": Read 384840
[06:53:24] - Reading up to 36384 from "work/wudata_01.xtc": Read 36384
[06:53:24] goefile size: 0
[06:53:24] logfile size: 35028
[06:53:24] Leaving Run
[06:53:28] - Writing 466460 bytes of core data to disk...
[06:53:28] Done: 465948 -> 415626 (compressed to 89.2 percent)
[06:53:29]   ... Done.
[06:53:29] - Shutting down core
[06:53:29] 
[06:53:29] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[06:53:33] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[06:53:33] Unit 1 finished with 94 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[06:53:33] Updated performance fraction: 0.936588
[06:53:33] Sending work to server
[06:53:33] Project: 6508 (Run 9, Clone 268, Gen 23)
[06:53:33] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.


[06:53:33] + Attempting to send results [March 17 06:53:33 UTC]
[06:53:33] - Reading file work/wuresults_01.dat from core
[06:53:33]   (Read 416138 bytes from disk)
[06:53:33] Connecting to http://171.64.65.62:8080/
[06:53:38] Posted data.
[06:53:38] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~67 kB/s
[06:53:39] - Averaged speed for that direction ~67 kB/s
[06:53:39] + Results successfully sent
[06:53:39] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[06:53:39] + Starting local stats count at 1
[06:53:43] Trying to send all finished work units
[06:53:43] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[06:53:43] + -oneunit flag given and have now finished a unit. Exiting.***** Got a SIGTERM signal (2)
[06:53:43] Killing all core threads

Folding@Home Client Shutdown.
BR,
Napoleon (Team 191980)
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Project: 6524 (Run 10, Clone 48, Gen 65) - isn't bad

Post by PantherX »

Nothing in the WU Database yet so I have marked it for a follow-up.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Project: 6524 (Run 10, Clone 48, Gen 65) - isn't bad

Post by PantherX »

You folded it without any issues:
Hi Napoleon (team 191980),
Your WU (P6524 R10 C48 G65) was added to the stats database on 2011-03-19 23:03:38 for 89 points of credit.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Post Reply