6701 (Run 91, Clone 22, Gen 12) - dozens of failures

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
parkut
Posts: 365
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:33 am
Hardware configuration: Running exclusively Linux headless blades. All are dedicated crunching machines.
Location: SE Michigan, USA

6701 (Run 91, Clone 22, Gen 12) - dozens of failures

Post by parkut »

Never seen this before.

I had 6701 (Run 91, Clone 22, Gen 12) assigned to two linux machines
repeatedly, then immediately fail with a CoreStatus 0 (0)
(one machine 32 times in a row, the other over 100 times in a row)

Typically, a WU will fail several times in a row, then get a different
one assigned. Not this time. Even deleting queue.dat and the
work director contents did not help. I was issued the same WU.

I do not normally use a proxy, the client work stations connect directly.

The odd thing is, I configured them both to use a proxy on a
different internet service provider, restarted the clients, and
was immediately assigned a new WU.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: 6701 (Run 91, Clone 22, Gen 12) - dozens of failures

Post by bruce »

According to viewtopic.php?f=24&p=149786#p149786 big WUs have been turned off on Linux. I would think that if you're reassigned WUs from this project before a new version of FahCore_a3 is released, something is wrong. I'll bet that the shutdown is related to the problem that you're reporting.
parkut
Posts: 365
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:33 am
Hardware configuration: Running exclusively Linux headless blades. All are dedicated crunching machines.
Location: SE Michigan, USA

Re: 6701 (Run 91, Clone 22, Gen 12) - dozens of failures

Post by parkut »

6701 is not bigadv
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: 6701 (Run 91, Clone 22, Gen 12) - dozens of failures

Post by bruce »

You're right, it's not. I have not figured out an easy way to tell the difference. How do you do it?

In any case, other people have had trouble with this WU so I'm reporting it as a Bad WU.
Zagen30
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:45 am
Hardware configuration: Core i7 3770K @3.5 GHz (not folding), 8 GB DDR3 @2133 MHz, 2xGTX 780 @1215 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit running 7.3.6 w/ 1xSMP, 2xGPU

4P E5-4650 @3.1 GHz, 64 GB DDR3 @1333MHz, Ubuntu Desktop 13.10 64-bit

Re: 6701 (Run 91, Clone 22, Gen 12) - dozens of failures

Post by Zagen30 »

bruce wrote:You're right, it's not. I have not figured out an easy way to tell the difference. How do you do it?
All of the bigadv projects so far have been numbered 268x.
Image
uncle fuzzy
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: 6701 (Run 91, Clone 22, Gen 12) - dozens of failures

Post by uncle fuzzy »

bruce wrote:How do you do it?
Remember all those posts complaining about the SMP WU from Hell? 6701.:D
Proud to crash my machines as a Beta Tester!

Image
Post Reply