Search found 339 matches
- Fri Dec 04, 2015 5:27 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Core 21 failures on GTX970
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9207
Re: Core 21 failures on GTX970
Thanks for the report! Looking into these failures (since they are ours): project:10496 run:85 clone:1 gen:0 This failure appeared to use 0.0.12, so we didn't get the extra debug info back. project:11411 run:2 clone:12 gen:2 This one didn't return debug information either. This seems to be due to th...
- Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:59 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: Core 21 causing severe GUI lag on Linux
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9526
Re: Core 21 causing severe GUI lag on Linux
We found and fixed a few memory leaks in earlier core 21 versions, so it is surprising we are still seeing leaks. We have found an issue (since 0.0.12) where the simulation might encounter a `NaN` that is not detected until the next snapshot/checkpoint. The simulation slows down at this point as the...
- Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:59 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: Core 21 causing severe GUI lag on Linux
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9526
Re: Core 21 causing severe GUI lag on Linux
Ah, nevermind. I see it *was* 0.0.12 in the log snippet.
- Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:59 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: Core 21 causing severe GUI lag on Linux
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9526
Re: Core 21 causing severe GUI lag on Linux
@weirddan: Thanks for pointing this out! Can you confirm this was with core 21 version 0.0.12?
- Tue Oct 20, 2015 2:34 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: Core 21 causing severe GUI lag on Linux
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9526
Re: Core 21 causing severe GUI lag on Linux
Thanks for the report, @weirddan455! We've heard some of these reports before.
Does this happen with every core 21 WU, or just some of them (and if so, which project numbers)?
Could it be that FAHClient or the core is consuming all available memory, or is it really a pure GPU lag phenomena?
Does this happen with every core 21 WU, or just some of them (and if so, which project numbers)?
Could it be that FAHClient or the core is consuming all available memory, or is it really a pure GPU lag phenomena?
- Wed Oct 14, 2015 2:55 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 140.163.4.235 and 140.163.4.241
- Replies: 28
- Views: 9641
Re: 140.163.4.235 and 140.163.4.241
Thanks, everybody, and apologies again for the problems.
We found out that our servers had suddenly been added to an automated patching list, and are working to get them off that list so this doesn't happen again.
Please let us know if you are still encountering problems.
We found out that our servers had suddenly been added to an automated patching list, and are working to get them off that list so this doesn't happen again.
Please let us know if you are still encountering problems.
- Wed Oct 14, 2015 1:35 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 140.163.4.235 and 140.163.4.241
- Replies: 28
- Views: 9641
Re: 140.163.4.235 and 140.163.4.241
Thanks for the heads-up everybody. These servers rebooted around 9.30P EST last night for an unkown reason. All services should be back up now, but this isn't supposed to happen, so I'm trying to establish what went on.
- Tue Oct 13, 2015 10:32 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Re: New AS testing
- Replies: 35
- Views: 6478
Re: New AS testing
I've dropped Joseph an email about the issue.
- Thu Oct 08, 2015 9:23 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 140.163.4.235 and 140.163.4.241
- Replies: 28
- Views: 9641
Re: 140.163.4.235 and 140.163.4.241
billford, any chance you are on a static IP address, or know what IP address you were using at the time of the upload?
We'll try to trace what was going on there.
John
We'll try to trace what was going on there.
John