mrshirts wrote:The IT guy at Columbia has a backload, so the computer to relay the WU is not up yet. I'll keep updating as more information comes available. Since the timeout is long (60 days), hopefully most people will not end up affected in the end.
Search found 177 matches
- Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:07 am
- Forum: Announcements - Folding Consortium
- Topic: Two servers down -- work in progress
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3792
Re: Two servers down -- work in progress
- Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:27 am
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: FahMon (multi-platform app to monitor various F@h clients)
- Replies: 891
- Views: 228617
Re: FahMon (multi-platform app to monitor various F@h clients)
Perfect, thanks ! I wonder why the search function did not find that file for me ??? And why does it take forever under 2.3.4 to load the log file ? Because it is most likely in a hidden folder , which means the file is hidden as well. Even to the search function. You have to un-hide hidden files a...
- Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:09 am
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: FahMon (multi-platform app to monitor various F@h clients)
- Replies: 891
- Views: 228617
Re: FahMon (multi-platform app to monitor various F@h clients)
Would be somewhere like:
C:\Documents and Settings\User\Application Data\FahMon\config
You will have to set Windows to show hidden files and folders to be able to see the Application Data folder.
C:\Documents and Settings\User\Application Data\FahMon\config
You will have to set Windows to show hidden files and folders to be able to see the Application Data folder.
- Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:41 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Unable to connect to work server, project 2526
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1981
Re: Unable to connect to work server, project 2526
I think they mean that they want all the client files in one folder.
Not sure why they are zipping things up though, unless transferring it somewhere?
What client are they running.
And NO FAH FILES go into your computers chached dirs., so you can clean them as you wish.
Not sure why they are zipping things up though, unless transferring it somewhere?
What client are they running.
And NO FAH FILES go into your computers chached dirs., so you can clean them as you wish.
- Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:31 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Starting a team???
- Replies: 7
- Views: 966
Re: Starting a team???
You have to host your own web page or team forum to point to from the stats pages.
- Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:22 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.122.136 - Reject [FIXED]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2229
Re: 171.64.122.136 - Reject
Code: Select all
SERVER IP client NAME WHO STATUS CONNECT CPU LOAD
171.64.122.136 classic VSP69 luttmann accept Accepting 19.71
Under a bit of a load, but that is to be expected until things even back out.Thanks again all who worked on this.
- Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:59 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Could not transmit unit 05 to Collection server; keeping in
- Replies: 3
- Views: 909
Re: Could not transmit unit 05 to Collection server; keeping in
Yes, and it is being corrected as we speak. That server may take a few more days to get going again. I believe that they are backing everything up, and going to retire it as soon as it gets all its work back. Depends on the WU that was crunched. Not all WU's take the same amount if time to crunch, s...
- Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:53 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.122.136 - Reject [FIXED]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2229
Re: 171.64.122.136 - Reject
Thanks Prof. Pande... Please disregard the e-mail that I just sent. Looks like we were typing at the same time. 
- Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:45 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Could not transmit unit 05 to Collection server; keeping in
- Replies: 3
- Views: 909
Re: Could not transmit unit 05 to Collection server; keeping in
Welcome to the foldingforum Nikos.
Please see >> viewtopic.php?p=85943#p85943
Please see >> viewtopic.php?p=85943#p85943
- Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:41 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.122.136 - Reject [FIXED]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2229
Re: 171.64.122.136 - Reject
warpuck wrote:does any one know what is going on with that server?
We will have to wait until they get in today sometime, and they give a response.PM's sent to appropriate PG staff members.
- Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:19 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Unable to connect to work server, project 2526
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1981
Re: Unable to connect to work server, project 2526
Welcome to the foldingform, Fixitomg. Please post your FAHlog.txt file, so we have a bit more information to help you with. Just a guess, but some of the work servers as well as the collection servers have been having issues over the last few days. This situation should be corrected tomorrow morning...
- Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:14 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Attempting to send results
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1570
Re: Attempting to send results
128.59.74.4 is having issues, and was announced here >> viewtopic.php?f=24&t=8601 . 171.65.103.100 is a collection sever. The CS's have been overloaded for some time, and the two work server issues have made that situation worse. There is new server code in works, that should alleviate these iss...
- Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:46 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: CSs 171.67.108.17 - 171.65.103.100 - 171.67.108.25
- Replies: 52
- Views: 8051
Re: Problems with CS 171.67.108.17
Ditto for 171.64.122.136, the associated work server. Completed work units to other servers get through OK. Server .136 is in reject mode, and has been reported >> viewtopic.php?p=85884#p85884 . And on a related note, I've got a Windows machine that's having problems sending its completed units to ...
- Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:33 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: CSs 171.67.108.17 - 171.65.103.100 - 171.67.108.25
- Replies: 52
- Views: 8051
Re: Problems with CS 171.67.108.17
Yes, welcome SyntorX.
I apologize for the abrupt statement that I made before. I should have explained a bit more carefully, which Bruce has done well. I really didn't mean to sound rude, it was not my intention. I was in a hurry, and should not have posted until I had the time to respond fully.
I apologize for the abrupt statement that I made before. I should have explained a bit more carefully, which Bruce has done well. I really didn't mean to sound rude, it was not my intention. I was in a hurry, and should not have posted until I had the time to respond fully.
- Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:14 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.122.136 - Reject [FIXED]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2229
171.64.122.136 - Reject [FIXED]
Anyone else having this problem 
Unable to connect to work server, project 2526
PM's sent to appropriate PG staff members.
Unable to connect to work server, project 2526
PM's sent to appropriate PG staff members.