21:15:38:WU00:FS02:Uploading 10.27MiB to 128.252.203.9
....
21:34:53:WU00:FS02:Upload 92.51%
21:34:53:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Exception: Failed to send results to work server: Transfer failed
I think this is a problem for close to a day now?
Search found 25 matches
- Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:02 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Full database on 128.252.203.1 and .9?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1227
- Thu Sep 17, 2020 11:32 pm
- Forum: V7.6.x Public Release Windows/Linux/MacOS X
- Topic: Looking for a Light OS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3444
Re: Looking for a Light OS
Add linux lite 4.8 to your list. Based on ubuntu 18.04, clean and light gui.
5.0+ will also work, its based on 20.04 which needs python 2 workarounds for fahcontrol.
5.0+ will also work, its based on 20.04 which needs python 2 workarounds for fahcontrol.
- Fri Aug 21, 2020 8:26 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: covid moonshot bad wu setup
- Replies: 52
- Views: 38230
Re: covid moonshot bad wu setup
If you are folding on the cpu, maybe try pausing that WU to see if the gpu wu picks up ppd. I've noticed some of the 134xx units like to have better cpu access to keep the gpu better fed. (Dual rx470 and r5 3600 cpu)
- Mon Aug 03, 2020 6:35 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 18.188.125.154 / 13421
- Replies: 0
- Views: 751
18.188.125.154 / 13421
Having a string of bad WU from the 18.188.125.154 server, get 4 bad 13421 wu before fahclient changes servers. First WU from new server works fine. Each of my 470's had the same scenario play out.
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 5:41 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: 13421 WUs with abnormally long runtime
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1853
Re: 13421 WUs with abnormally long runtime
How are you giving the gpu work units more cores? I have lowered the cpu slot to 6c out of 12, and bumped a22 priority on a wu per wu basis when I can, but only see 2 process threads per wu. I would like to try this as well, as 13421 has some pretty low performance for me (rx470, ppd down to half, p...
- Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:50 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Ellesmere XT Cards Directed to Work Server 192.0.2.1
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4354
Re: Ellesmere XT Cards Directed to Work Server 192.0.2.1
Out of curiousity, where/how does fahclient get the gpu info from? CLinfo (linux) lists both the Device name as 'Ellesmere', but also Device Board Name (AMD) as 'AMD Radeon (TM) RX 470 Graphics' a few lines down - which is correct in my instance.
- Sat Jul 25, 2020 1:35 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Ellesmere XT Cards Directed to Work Server 192.0.2.1
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4354
Re: RX 580s not folding
I already received work units from 18.188.125.154:8080 for both gpus. That didnt take long.
- Sat Jul 25, 2020 1:02 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Ellesmere XT Cards Directed to Work Server 192.0.2.1
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4354
Re: RX 580s not folding
Dual rx470's, same problem here. Figured it was just a shortage of work units, or is this a different issue?
- Wed Jul 08, 2020 8:59 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: project 13416 high wu failure rate
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2031
Re: project 13416 high wu failure rate
They seem be uploading properly after failing. Just wanted to offer the issue up in case there are any known issues with my latest config (20.04 + amdgpu 20.20) that would be fixable on my end, or provide any relevant info that doesnt make it when uploading as a failed WU.
- Tue Jul 07, 2020 11:43 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: project 13416 high wu failure rate
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2031
project 13416 high wu failure rate
Having an issue in the last few days where I get a high rate of bad wu, but only stemming from 13416. They fail in a multitude of ways, a few have been described here for 13415, so I don't think this really a surprise. Comp is 2 rx470 cards, ubuntu 20.04 / 5.4 kernel. 20.20 amdgpu opencl. Latest con...