Search found 13 matches
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:10 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: manually trigger checkpoint save
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3843
Re: manually trigger checkpoint save
Being that it is now 24 hours since I switched to 3 minute checkpoints, I just compared the last 24 hours with 4 restarts, to the days before with 30 minute checkpoints & 4 restarts. It is very hard to compare, especially on this computer since sometimes its day job keeps it busier on some days ...
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 2:03 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: manually trigger checkpoint save
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3843
Re: manually trigger checkpoint save
Bruce, I appreciate your comments. Could you be more specific? If the save can only be done at specific times, then how does that tie into the checkpoint frequency? Currently I have the checkpoint set at 3 & I only lose a minute or two of data each time the client restarts, compared to an averag...
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:00 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: manually trigger checkpoint save
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3843
Re: manually trigger checkpoint save
Concerning future enhancements: According to control's log, the core shuts down when "client is no longer detected." Wouldn't it be nice if core instead of immediately shutting down & abandoning work already done, it would first save?
- Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:44 pm
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: manually trigger checkpoint save
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3843
Re: manually trigger checkpoint save
How involved is a checkpoint save? If it were to take a fraction of a second of the core's time, then I assume that they would simply set the core to make the save often & eliminate the option to change the checkpoint from the configuration menu. If we knew how time consuming the save was, then ...
- Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:37 pm
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: manually trigger checkpoint save
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3843
Re: manually trigger checkpoint save
the difference in performance between the default setting of 15 minutes and 30 minutes is negligible from my tests a couple years ago. That said, I would not set the checkpoint frequency too low, then you will start to see performance issues from the frequent disk writes and file creation. How low ...
- Thu Jan 23, 2014 9:28 pm
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: manually trigger checkpoint save
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3843
manually trigger checkpoint save
On a particular Mac Mini most of the time it runs FAH 7.3.6 on full, but we cannot leave it on full or even medium constantly. It keeps the Mini from doing its day job, keeping other computers on a network happy. A few times a day a free AppleStore app, LaunchOnTime, automatically runs AppleScripts ...
- Tue Jan 21, 2014 9:11 pm
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Show configuration of an already running client in Terminal
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1664
Re: Show configuration of an already running client in Termi
For months I've run with next-unit-percentage set at default. Of course, I haven't watched it every time, but each time I was watching, it started downloading at 98%. Now, with it set at 100%, 4 times in a row it started downloading only after the current WU finished. I'm not that concerned about th...
- Tue Jan 21, 2014 4:34 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Show configuration of an already running client in Terminal
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1664
Re: Show configuration of an already running client in Termi
Thank you! A couple a minutes ago FAH started downloading at 98% even after I checked & made sure next-unit-percentage was set to 99%. I was sitting here racking my brain trying to figure out where I had goofed up. Thank you.
- Tue Jan 21, 2014 2:25 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Show configuration of an already running client in Terminal
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1664
Re: Show configuration of an already running client in Termi
Thanks everyone. Using telenet works great. It's fun to take a look at. I've made a note to myself. Knowing how to use telenet may come in very handy. Once the current WU finishes, I'll restart the client, make a copy of the beginning of the log & set verbosity back to 3. FAHClient --send-comman...
- Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:27 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Show configuration of an already running client in Terminal
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1664
Show configuration of an already running client in Terminal
If I'm running FAH within terminal I can use FAHClient --print to see how FAH is configured. How do I get terminal to show the configuration for an already running client, a client running via FAHControl? Running FAHControl 7.3.6 on a Mac Mini, I've entered into Terminal: FAHClient --send-command 'o...
- Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:22 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: adjusting power levels automatically
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1112
Re: adjusting power levels automatically
calxalot, I made a very simple script using AppleScript that says: do shell script "FAHClient --send-command 'option power light'" Using a free app from the AppleStore called LaunchOnTime it triggers the script at the time set in the app. Later the same app triggers another equally simple ...
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:33 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: adjusting power levels automatically
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1112
Re: adjusting power levels automatically
calxalot, Thanks. Using terminal never crossed my mind. In the Apple II & early Mac days when there wasn't software for everything I used to be able to think outside the box & not rely on a GUI for everything. I never learned to use launchd. When Apple deprecated cron, I used iCal notificati...
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:58 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: adjusting power levels automatically
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1112
adjusting power levels automatically
I cannot run FAH 7.36 on medium or full, at times on a new Mac Mini, because other computers on a network rely on it & it slows other things down. Sometimes even light is too much. If I leave it set at idle, F@H doesn't run much even at night because this computer is seldom totally idle. It woul...